As the title implies, this blog is all about butt-bruising, tush-tanning, seat-smacking, heiny-heating SPANKING!
(strictly of the Female Dominant kind; here we treat
a lady with respect - except, of course, when we
want to get her mad enough to, well, you know...)
Just like Jay Em or Eric Stanton, I can actually feel the strength of your women as well as their beauty. I just know what kind of loud, wet, meaty smacks that hairbrush would be creating, and what kind of breath-catching, panic-inducing pain it would be producing. Truly celestial calves! Great drawing!
I love the fact that your women all have a specific look; retro 1950s early 1960s. No doubt it brings back memories for subs who were disciplined at home growing up. Nothing even remotely resembling the classic dominatrix look to be found here (though I do know of a few pros who enjoy adopting this classic retro look). Highly original. Lots of fun! ;-)
RedRump - You are creating masterpieces of f/m spanking art! Thank you so much; fans of this genre are very lucky you've arrived. I'll add that yoir rendering of the spankers' legs are fantastic.
Thanks, HMP! Yes, I am something of an addict of the era from about 1950 through to the mid 60's. There are a lot of spanking blogs out there, and I've been thinking about what direction I might take mine to give it a defined 'flavor', and leaning heavily toward a retro look might be the way to go.
Since I wasn't even alive in the 50's, I can't draw from reminisences, but I can attempt an idealized, iconic look to the women who will appear in the photos or in my artwork.
And I'm thrilled you find the approach so far to be fun!
As someone who as reared in the 50's and whose mother treated me more than once with waving her hair brush before "inviting" me over knees, I don't really remember what her legs looked like just that I think I was both scared but still somehow looking forward to it
You're welcome! And thanks for your comment on her legs - beautiful legs are a HUGE part of what made me into a spanko in the first place. As a kid, the only real view of the female form you had common access to was of legs, so I nurtured an appreciation which very quickly matured into a desire to be up close and personal with them, vis a vis dangling across them.
Most of the women you show are angry -or at least irritated, and while that is an appropriate mood to deliver a sound spanking, you might want to depict women who enjoy what they are doing (and smile while they are blistering their man's bare backside) : this, at any rate, is the way my wife looks when she flogs or paddles my sorry bottom!
She looks so strong! : ) And you've made the effort to add colours... Superb work I can't draw like that, especially teh facial expresions. Was it part of your studies? Or just a hobbie? Like you I'm mostly interested in 1950s until mid 60's. Please keep doing!
The aim was to depict a woman on the fine line between sexy and truly daunting. I don't know if I succeeded, but she sure intimdates the heck out of me!
You can be certain I will keep up the retro theme - the more I explore it, the more I love it too.
RR, You have succeeded to an iconic level. More, perhaps, than Stanton and Em. She is angry now and will not be denied: her naughty boy will suffer over her knee. But, equally evident, there is an aura of sexuality that fires the imagination. After the spanking, the sobs and tears, maybe not that day, or maybe in the middle of the night, she will take the boy, squealing and pleading, to heaven.
Alex. Art has come a long way in the twenty-first-century - you would not believe the "pencils" they make nowadays. Get more into it yourself - it's fun.
Yes! Yes! Yes! You know, I don't think of myself as that much of a leg fetishist. But I think you may be encouraging me in that direction, RR. :)
As for the angry expression, I like it - although as you can tell from my drawings, 'evil amusement' is at the very top of my list. :) that much of a leg fetishist. But I think you may be encouraging me in that direction, RR. :)
As for the angry expression, I like it - although as you can tell from my drawings, 'evil amusement' is at the very top of my list. :)
Well, there are boxes for 'cool' and 'Give me more' - I assume a check in either means the same thing. Glad you're enjoying the work - thanks for the comment, always appreciated
You've portrayed someone who's not to be messed with!
ReplyDeleteJust like Jay Em or Eric Stanton, I can actually feel the strength of your women as well as their beauty. I just know what kind of loud, wet, meaty smacks that hairbrush would be creating, and what kind of breath-catching, panic-inducing pain it would be producing. Truly celestial calves! Great drawing!
ReplyDeleteYou have a way with words, Otto! 'celestial' calves - I love it - you should be a writer.
ReplyDeleteI love the fact that your women all have a specific look; retro 1950s early 1960s. No doubt it brings back memories for subs who were disciplined at home growing up. Nothing even remotely resembling the classic dominatrix look to be found here (though I do know of a few pros who enjoy adopting this classic retro look). Highly original. Lots of fun! ;-)
ReplyDeleteRedRump - You are creating masterpieces of f/m spanking art! Thank you so much; fans of this genre are very lucky you've arrived. I'll add that yoir rendering of the spankers' legs are fantastic.
ReplyDelete@Her Majesty's Plaything -
ReplyDeleteThanks, HMP! Yes, I am something of an addict of the era from about 1950 through to the mid 60's.
There are a lot of spanking blogs out there, and I've been thinking about what direction I might take mine to give it a defined 'flavor', and leaning heavily toward a retro look might be the way to go.
Since I wasn't even alive in the 50's, I can't draw from reminisences, but I can attempt an idealized, iconic look to the women who will appear in the photos or in my artwork.
And I'm thrilled you find the approach so far to be fun!
As someone who as reared in the 50's and whose mother treated me more than once with waving her hair brush before "inviting" me over knees, I don't really remember what her legs looked like just that I think I was both scared but still somehow looking forward to it
Delete@ Anonymous -
ReplyDeleteYou're welcome! And thanks for your comment on her legs - beautiful legs are a HUGE part of what made me into a spanko in the first place. As a kid, the only real view of the female form you had common access to was of legs, so I nurtured an appreciation which very quickly matured into a desire to be up close and personal with them, vis a vis dangling across them.
Most of the women you show are angry -or at least irritated, and while that is an appropriate mood to deliver a sound spanking, you might want to depict women who enjoy what they are doing (and smile while they are blistering their man's bare backside) : this, at any rate, is the way my wife looks when she flogs or paddles my sorry bottom!
ReplyDeleteThis is fantastic, real spanking art. Bring back the 50's Please do keep up the good work. I love it....
ReplyDeleteWow....masterful! Perfection.
ReplyDeleteShe looks so strong! : )
ReplyDeleteAnd you've made the effort to add colours...
Superb work
I can't draw like that, especially teh facial expresions. Was it part of your studies? Or just a hobbie?
Like you I'm mostly interested in 1950s until mid 60's. Please keep doing!
Alex/Dave/Anonymous -
ReplyDeleteThe aim was to depict a woman on the fine line between sexy and truly daunting. I don't know if I succeeded, but she sure intimdates the heck out of me!
You can be certain I will keep up the retro theme - the more I explore it, the more I love it too.
RR,
ReplyDeleteYou have succeeded to an iconic level. More, perhaps, than Stanton and Em. She is angry now and will not be denied: her naughty boy will suffer over her knee. But, equally evident, there is an aura of sexuality that fires the imagination. After the spanking, the sobs and tears, maybe not that day, or maybe in the middle of the night, she will take the boy, squealing and pleading, to heaven.
Alex. Art has come a long way in the twenty-first-century - you would not believe the "pencils" they make nowadays. Get more into it yourself - it's fun.
ReplyDelete@ katlyn -
ReplyDeleteOK, now more than my rump is blushing...
And I love your extrapolations on the scenario!
Very, very solid drawing -- this hardens me and makes me fear that scolding, but brings me closer and needful. i would want to be hurt by this Woman
ReplyDeleteYes! Yes! Yes! You know, I don't think of myself as that much of a leg fetishist. But I think you may be encouraging me in that direction, RR. :)
ReplyDeleteAs for the angry expression, I like it - although as you can tell from my drawings, 'evil amusement' is at the very top of my list. :) that much of a leg fetishist. But I think you may be encouraging me in that direction, RR. :)
As for the angry expression, I like it - although as you can tell from my drawings, 'evil amusement' is at the very top of my list. :)
You REALLY do have to add a tab that says: I LOVE THIS DRAWING ! So many awesome ones...
ReplyDeleteWell, there are boxes for 'cool' and 'Give me more' - I assume a check in either means the same thing. Glad you're enjoying the work - thanks for the comment, always appreciated
Delete